How we’d improve
these decks.
We read real company decks from beginning to end: what they’re trying to say, what works, and where the story gets hard to follow. Then we show the edits worth making, with the originals alongside. When a slide already works, we explain why we would keep it.
ElevenLabs: Put the first customer before the expansion plan
A review of the available early deck, from the dubbing problem to the research appendix, followed by a proposed order and a proposed edit that keeps the original product demo.
Read the breakdown
Anthropic: Make the case for joining the team
A company and recruiting presentation that ends with an invitation to join. We review it for that audience and flag the uncertainty in the reproduced source.
Read the breakdown
Mistral: Why we would keep the memo
We read the seven-page strategic memo in full, and explain why we would retain the memo rather than compress it into a timeline. The memo remains useful supporting material.
Read the breakdown
Perplexity: Get to the advertising offer sooner
A review of the 33-page advertiser presentation: what the buyer needs, where the offer arrives, and how we would reorganize it.
Read the breakdown
Decagon: Connect the performance claim to customer evidence
The public deck moves quickly from growth to customer proof. We review the sequence, account for the redactions, and show where its existing customer evidence would help the story.
Read the breakdownRead the whole deck
Start with the audience and follow the presentation in order. We look at the story, the evidence, and what the reader is being asked to do.
Explain the changes
Decide what to keep, cut, move, or explain. A different layout only helps when it makes the argument easier to follow.
Show the difference
See proposed edits beside the source. Some reviews change a layout; others keep the page and improve the sequence.